Saturday, 20 October 2007

Britain's youngest thought criminal?

The race hustlers are really out in force at the moment. I'm not quite sure why - there isn't a full moon or anything. But out in force they are, and here is their latest good deed:

A headteacher has defended her decision to investigate an allegation that a four-year-old boy was guilty of racism during a game of chase.

Anne Phipps acted after Rocky Smith spat at a 10-year-old black boy on the school's playing field. She said she had no choice but to pursue the accusation, despite the child's age.

The investigation, at Bedenham Primary School in Gosport, Hants, has angered Rocky's parents.

How very intolerant they must be!

Mrs Phipps said: "When a child makes an allegation of any kind, whether it's bullying, racism, or general unhappiness, we investigate by talking to them. We couldn't dismiss this.

"A nursery nurse spoke to Rocky and I spoke to the older boy. We talked to them about what happened and why it might have happened. That's what an investigation is in a primary school.

"In this case, a little boy did think something had happened and felt he had been singled out. But after investigating, I decided this was not the case – it was just naughty behaviour."

Note that even professional race hustlers are mystified by Mrs Phipps's behaviour:
Tunde Bright-Davies, the chairwoman of the Racial Harassment Forum, said: "A very young child can hate another person because of the colour of their skin – I have met with a boy of six who said he used to be racist."
Of course, one might wonder whether the testimony of a six year-old can be considered conclusive proof of anything, other than, perhaps, the suggestibility of six year-olds. Nonetheless Ms Bright-Davies is quite correct when she adds:

"But with the circumstances of this incident, there was no name calling, no racial connotation, no 'get away from me', so you can't found racism on just spitting.

"I don't know why it was investigated as a racist incident."

The only explanation that I can think of, is that a white child did something very mildly unpleasant to a black child. In such circumstances, a certain kind of race-obsessed liberal will infer that, because the "perpetrator" was a designated oppressor, and the recipient a designated victim, the action must have been racially motivated. Thus I was once accused of "racism" by a grossly obese, utterly humourless, and terminally liberal German, simply for telling a joke at the expense of an Indian, even though the joke had nothing to do with race. This attitude, whereby racism is specifically sought out in even the most innocuous of situations, is clearly one possessed by Mrs Phipps. Such a wonderful thought, isn't it, that this is the kind of person in charge of our children?

I do note, however, that Mrs Phipps implied that a complaint of racism had been made by the ten year-old black boy. If so, then I must say that he is a child of very promising genius in the art of race hustling. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that he could even be the new Keith Vaz, and to express the hope that his parents will do all they can to nurture his undoubted talent. It really is quite impressive for a ten year-old to be so well acquainted with the magical properties inherent in accusing someone whom one dislikes of the heinous crime of "racism". Of course, it is somewhat less impressive for a ten year-old to go running to teacher over the actions of a child less than half his age, but I suppose that the value of playing the victim is now being instilled in Britain's children almost from birth, and that this, at least, is a lesson many are learning.

1 comment:

najistani said...


The primary objective of all Muslims is to spread Islam throughout the globe by whatever means may be necessary, including lying and killing. Killing kuffars (unbelievers) who resist Islam is not a sin, in fact it is the only sure way of attaining paradise. Kuffars who do not resist must be either enslaved (dhimmis) or converted to Islam.

So, with the current Jihad in the West, how does this Islamic program of killing/enslavement/conversion apply to kuffar kids?

The first wave of attacks in the present Jihad mostly killed adults, though there were a few children incinerated on the 9/11 flights. It was only with the deliberate torturing and killing of kuffar children at Beslan that the civilised world realised that Muslims worship Allah in the same way that the abominators worshipped Moloch.
In addition, many of the Beslan children were humiliated by being raped and forced to drink their own urine before being killed. Humiliation of the kuffar is very important in Islam.

Muslim theologians have called for the sacrifice of 2 million American children to Allah, and recent events in Scotland seem to show that children in the U.K. are also prime targets for attack. Jihadists tortured, castrated and murdered a fifteen year old , and the failed Glasgow airport attack was timed for the first day of the school holidays with the obvious intention of burning as many families as possible.

It is rather disconcerting to realise that this attack appears to have been carried out by doctors, especially as the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association are on record as stating that their duty of care does not extend to kuffars.
How many of these Doctors of Death have access to childrens wards?

In summary: a jihadist who believes that killing kuffars will get him to Allah's bordello in the sky doesn't care whether his victims are men, women or children. All kuffar human-sacrifices are equally pleasing to Allah.

The Islamic abduction, rape and sexual subjugation of young kuffar girls may be new to our generation with the comparatively recent cultural enrichment of our cities, but this typical Muslim practice goes back into history, and the West has suffered from it before.

Of course every culture produces child molesters, but in non-Muslim societies these are usually isolated loners. In contrast, Muslim pedophiles are well-organised and these predators often hunt their prey in rape-gangs in a tradition of Muslim razzia going back to the 'prophet'. The reason for this cultural difference is that pedophilia and rape are abhorrent in civilised societies, but are socially acceptable to Muslims because they are dutifully following Mohammed's example.

As well as being after our children's bodies, either as burned and mangled sacrifices to Allah or living sex-slaves, they are also determined to brainwash our children's minds with their vile cult.

A favorite trick is 'role playing' to indoctrinate young children to think of themselves as Muslims.

In addition, there is an insidious program to destroy our children's cultural heritage , with attempts to abolish festivals loved by generations of kuffar children and put Islamic events in their place.

British Muslims are demanding a ban within state schools on music, dance, drama, biology, swimming and lessons about any other religion but Islam. There are also to be compulsory history lessons about the 'massive contribution that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation'. In fact, Islamic culture is so backward that Muslims are incapable of bringing anything new to the West. The West has long ago moved on from its medieval phase and few citizens of Western countries (apart from immigrant Muslims) would want to return to it. All the things that Muslims have brought to our civilisation are negative and barbaric. However, don't expect historical accuracy to stand in the way of implementing a politically correct curriculum.

So, unless present trends can be reversed, the only foreseeable future for our children will be death, dhimmitude or conversion.