Today's Burning Issue: Diversity

White men have been banned from fire brigade recruitment sessions because bosses want to hit their diversity targets.

Four out of five "open" days held by Avon Fire Service were restricted to women and ethnic minorities.

Critics last night accused the West Country brigade of discrimination. An MP said the move would fuel resentment and undermine race relations.

Avon's bosses insist their ban on white men is simply "positive action".

Well that's alright then!

It should be noted that attending an open day is not the same as being recruited - white men are still allowed to apply for jobs with the Avon Fire Service, just as much as their betters. But while this "positive action" is apparently intended merely to encourage "under-represented" groups to apply for positions in the fire service (not that there is at present anything preventing them from applying, or from getting the job, if they're the best qualified candidate), it is also likely to discourage white men from applying for such positions. After all, most people, if told that they weren't welcome at the open day, would feel rather less enthusiastic about the employer, and rather less confident of their chances of getting the job, and in consequence would be less likely to apply.

I don't suppose that a great many people who are trapped on top of a burning building really care whether the person who comes to rescue them is a man or a woman, or what race they are. Even the most hardened race hustler or radical feminist is unlikely to give themselves up to the flames because their rescuers are insufficiently diverse. But what most people in such a situation would want, would be for the people sent to save them to be the people best suited for the task. Discriminatory policies such as these, which are likely to result in well-qualified individuals opting not to apply for positions, is highly likely to result in firemen (sorry, firepeople) being selected from a smaller pool of applicants, with the possibility that those selected will be of a lower standard as a result. This is a bad thing in all circumstances, and particularly in such life and death circumstances as those commonly dealt with by the fire brigade. Still, if anyone does suffer as a result of such idiocies, they can at least console themselves with the thought that they die, that diversity might live!

Postscript: Avon Fire Service has something of a history of destructive political correctness. In October, it was revealed that four firemen employed by the service had been disciplined after disturbing a group of men who were cottaging on Bristol Downs.

Real Crime Good, Thought Crime Bad

On 27th June, at around 10.30 in the evening, four firemen were driving their engine back to Bristol's Temple Fire Station, when, while passing by the area of open space known as the Downs, they encountered four homosexuals cottaging in a clump of bushes. Upon making this discovery they shone their torches on the participants, before going on their way.

Now, it seems that the cottagers were not very happy about this treatment, and felt that their wonderful and wholesome evening's entertainment had been spoiled. So one of them contacted the Terrence Higgins Trust, who advised him to make a complaint alleging that he and his fellow cottagers had been subjected to "homophobic" victimisation. The complaint was duly made, and following an investigation, during which the accused firemen were suspended from duty, the fire brigade fined two of the firemen, demoted a third, and issued a written warning to a fourth. In addition, all four firemen will be attending a fascinating-sounding conference on the subject of "Lesbians, Gays, Bi-sexuals and Transgender Equality in the Fire Service - an absolute taboo?". Meanwhile, the complainant, whose night of fun was so cruelly curtailed, has pronounced himself happy with the result.

And he certainly should be happy. After all, he's really dealt a blow against the evil of "homophobia", hasn't he? Getting four firemen suspended and then disciplined for shining torches? Result!
In addition, the incident has not been reported to the police, so he and his associates will not have to face the consequences of their crime. Because cottaging is, of course, illegal! Indeed, I'm amazed at the gall of the man (and the Terrence Higgins Trust, who encouraged him), to actually kick up a fuss about a thought crime, when he himself was caught red-handed (or red something, anyway) in the commission of a real crime. I'd also point out that he should count himself lucky that it was these firemen who found him and his friends. Had it been people of a less tolerant and more violent nature, then he might have had rather more worries than simply the fact that a light was shone at him.

As for the Terrence Higgins Trust: I thought that they existed in order to provide support and representation for people infected with HIV. So far as I know, they do not exist in order to play victimhood poker. The fire brigade is equally at fault, and their craven response to this complaint provides yet another indicator of the extent to which politically correct orthodoxy has infiltrated the entire public sector.

Indeed, the only people who appear to have behaved decently through all this are the very people who have been labelled as wicked bigots, and subjected to punishment for their thought crime. In my opinion, they were entirely correct to act in the manner which they chose. Cottaging is an extremely unpleasant form of anti-social behaviour, which can render an area unvisitable by decent people, just as surely as can gangs of thugs drinking on street corners. Those who engage in it do not have a right to be left to their own devices while doing so. This is not to say that I endorse the actions of those who engage in "queer-bashing" (although I would not be greatly upset if queer bashers were to catch the complainant in this case, next time he goes for a nocturnal adventure). However, it does mean that I support those members of the public who make a more peaceable attempt to shame cottagers into ceasing their anti-social behaviour, just as I would support members of the public who used peaceful methods in an attempt to make street corner drinkers behave more reasonably. In the case of cottagers, who thrive off being hidden from view, despite being in public, I would think that shining powerful torches upon their activities was an excellent way of dealing with them.